A new version is available.

Reload to update to the latest version.

Solana Rent Reduction: Reclaim Excess SOL
Solana Rent Reduction: Reclaim Excess SOL

Solana Rent Reduction: Reclaim Excess SOL

September 4, 2026

Solana is lowering account rent by up to 90%, rolled out in steps. Older accounts now hold more SOL than they need, and you can reclaim the excess without closing anything. Here's what changed and when it's worth doing.

Solana is lowering the rent every account has to hold, by up to 90%. If you opened accounts before the change, they are now holding more SOL than the network requires, and you can take that surplus back without closing anything. Here's exactly what's happening, how much it's worth, and the honest answer on whether you should reclaim now or wait.

The short version

Rent on Solana is a refundable deposit, not a fee. Every account holds a small amount of SOL sized to its data, and that deposit comes back when the account is closed. A change called SIMD-0437 is cutting the rent requirement from 6,960 down to 696 lamports per byte, a 90% reduction, rolled out in five separate steps.

When the requirement drops, accounts you opened earlier are left holding more than the new minimum. That extra SOL, the excess, can be withdrawn while the account stays open and your tokens stay exactly where they are.

What is rent, really?

The name is misleading. Rent is not a recurring charge that gets slowly consumed. It's a fully refundable storage bond. Solana asks every account to hold a minimum balance based on how much data it stores, because validators have to keep that data on every machine in the network. Close the account and the deposit is returned in full.

The minimum is calculated with a simple formula:

minimum balance = (128 + account data size in bytes) × lamports per byte

The 128 is fixed storage overhead. A standard token account uses 165 bytes of data. The lamports per byte figure is the part that's changing, and that's what frees up the excess.

The five-step reduction, and where it actually stands

SIMD-0437 doesn't drop the rent to 696 in one move. It splits the cut across five independent feature gates, so core developers can pause between steps and watch how on-chain storage responds. Here's the full schedule:

Step Lamports per byte Reduction from 6,960 Status
Legacy 6,960 0% The old baseline
SIMD-0437-1 6,333 9% Live on mainnet (Sept 3, 2026)
SIMD-0437-2 5,080 27% On testnet, mainnet expected mid-Sept
SIMD-0437-3 2,575 63% Expected in Agave 4.4 (Nov 2026)
SIMD-0437-4 1,322 81% Expected in Agave 4.4 (Nov 2026)
SIMD-0437-5 696 90% Final target, Agave 4.4

So the widely quoted "90% cut" is the destination, not today's reality. As of now, the first 9% is live and 27% is close behind, with the deep cuts arriving later in 2026. There's even a built-in safeguard that can reset rent to the old value if the reduction causes problems, which is one more reason to read the current requirement live from the network rather than trusting any fixed number, including the ones in this article.

Three different actions, and why the difference matters

Lowering the minimum doesn't move any SOL on its own. You have to act, and there are three distinct things you can do:

Action Account stays open? Token or NFT affected? SOL you get back
Withdraw excess rent Yes No Only the surplus above the current minimum
Close an empty account No Nothing was in it The account's full remaining deposit
Burn an asset, then close No The asset is destroyed The reclaimable deposit after the burn

The new one is withdrawing excess rent. It uses the Token Program's WithdrawExcessLamports instruction, which leaves your token balance, the mint supply, and the account data completely untouched. It moves only the surplus lamports. This is a standard Solana capability, not something any single tool owns.

Not every account qualifies. It works for Token Program and Token-2022 token accounts, mints, and multisigs, but the usual authority rules apply, and wrapped-SOL accounts, metadata accounts, and compressed NFTs are not eligible.

How much SOL are we talking about?

The surplus on any account is its current balance minus the new minimum for its size. For a standard 165-byte token account that still holds the full legacy deposit, here's the range across the rollout:

After step 1 (9%) After step 5 (90%)
Excess on a 165-byte token account ~0.000184 SOL ~0.001835 SOL

Those are arithmetic examples, not promises. The real figure depends on the account's exact size, whether it's already had a withdrawal, and which step is active when you check. A tool may also take a fee, and you still pay the normal network transaction cost.

The honest takeaway from those numbers: at today's 9% step, the excess per account is small. It gets roughly ten times larger once the full reduction lands.

Should you reclaim now, or wait?

This is the question most guides skip, and the honest answer depends on one thing: whether you ever plan to close the account.

If you'll eventually close the account, reclaiming the excess now is mostly a timing choice. It's the same underlying deposit, so withdrawing the surplus today reduces what you'd get back when you close later. And because rent is still dropping in steps, the surplus on an account you keep open grows after each gate activates. Withdraw today at 9% and you capture a small amount; wait until the full 90% and the same account yields far more. So for an account you'll close anyway, there's a real case for waiting, or re-scanning after each step and withdrawing when the amount is worth the network fee.

If you'll never close the account, it's different, and this is the part worth understanding. Some accounts you want to keep indefinitely, an NFT you're holding long-term, a token account you use constantly. You're never going to "get the deposit back on close," because you're never closing it. For those accounts, the excess isn't money you're pulling forward from a future event. It's SOL that would otherwise sit locked in that account forever. Reclaiming it is a permanent gain, full stop.

There's also the reversal safeguard to consider. SIMD-0437 ships with a built-in fallback that can reset rent to the old 6,960 value if the reduction causes problems on the network, and a related proposal (SIMD-0392) allows rent to be raised again later. If that ever happens, accounts that never withdrew their surplus stay locked at the higher deposit. Accounts that did withdraw already moved that SOL to safety in your wallet. Reclaiming now effectively locks in the current excess against a future reversal. You can still re-scan and withdraw more as later steps activate, so it isn't "reclaim everything now or lose it," but taking what's available today does protect it.

Put simply: for accounts you'll close, reclaiming now versus later is a wash, and waiting often wins. For accounts you'll keep, or as a hedge against a possible reversal, reclaiming the excess is a genuine, permanent gain. The only thing to watch either way is the network fee, reclaiming a surplus smaller than the transaction cost isn't worth it.

The bigger win most people miss

For an active trading wallet, the excess rent on accounts you still use is usually the smaller prize. The larger one is the pile of empty token accounts you left behind every time you fully sold a token. Each of those holds its entire deposit, around 0.002 SOL, and closing them returns all of it. That adds up far faster than the current per-account excess, especially for anyone who's traded a lot of memecoins.

A good cleanup tool shows you both at once: the empty accounts worth closing, and the excess rent worth withdrawing, so you can decide what's worth doing today.

How CYS handles it

CYS was built to make reclaiming this SOL simple. When you connect your wallet, it reads the live account balances, the actual data length of each account, and the current rent minimum straight from the network, then shows you two separate figures: accounts to close, and excess rent to reclaim, adding up to a single total before you sign anything.

Because it reads the current minimum live, it stays correct as each feature gate activates. An account you keep open can qualify again after a later step, so it's worth re-scanning as the rollout continues rather than assuming one withdrawal captured the full reduction. Your tokens and NFTs are never touched by an excess-rent withdrawal, and valuable tokens are protected by default before anything is closed or burned.

Frequently asked questions

Is Solana rent being reduced in 2026?

Yes. SIMD-0437 lowers the rent constant from 6,960 to 696 lamports per byte, a 90% reduction, across five independent steps. The first step (9%) is live on mainnet as of September 3, 2026, with the remaining steps rolling out through late 2026. Always check the current on-chain minimum rather than assuming the full cut is active.

Does Solana refund the excess automatically?

No. Lowering the minimum does not move SOL out of existing accounts. An eligible token account can use the WithdrawExcessLamports instruction to transfer only the surplus above its current minimum, or an empty account can be closed to return its full deposit.

Can I reclaim excess rent without closing my account?

Yes. That's exactly what WithdrawExcessLamports does. The account stays open, your token or NFT stays in it, and only the surplus SOL moves to your wallet.

How much SOL will a token account need after the reduction?

It depends on the account's size and the active step. A standard 165-byte token account historically required about 0.00203928 SOL. After the final proposed step, its minimum would fall to roughly 0.000203928 SOL, if the rollout reaches that stage.

Can the same account reclaim excess more than once?

Yes. A withdrawal leaves the account at the current minimum. When a later step lowers the minimum again, the same account develops a new surplus and can be withdrawn from again, without closing it or changing its token balance.

Should I reclaim now or wait for the full reduction?

It depends on whether you'll ever close the account. If you plan to close it eventually, reclaiming now versus later is mostly a timing choice, and waiting often returns more because the surplus grows with each step. But if you'll keep the account indefinitely (say, an NFT you're holding long-term), that excess would otherwise stay locked forever, so reclaiming it is a permanent gain rather than an early withdrawal. Reclaiming now also protects that SOL if the network ever triggers its built-in fallback to raise rent back up. Either way, only reclaim when the surplus is larger than the network fee.

The takeaway

Solana's rent reduction is real and significant, but it's arriving in steps, and today's excess is a fraction of what the full cut will eventually free up. You can reclaim the surplus now without closing anything. For accounts you'll close one day, that's a timing decision and waiting often wins. For accounts you intend to keep, or as a hedge against the network's built-in option to raise rent back up, reclaiming the excess is a permanent gain worth taking. And for most active wallets, the biggest and simplest win of all is still closing the empty accounts you've already left behind. Check what you've got, understand the timing, and reclaim when it makes sense for you.

Scan your wallet and see what you can reclaim